The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF).

(0) Obligation:

Runtime Complexity TRS:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

Term_sub(Case(m, xi, n), s) → Frozen(m, Sum_sub(xi, s), n, s)
Frozen(m, Sum_constant(Left), n, s) → Term_sub(m, s)
Frozen(m, Sum_constant(Right), n, s) → Term_sub(n, s)
Frozen(m, Sum_term_var(xi), n, s) → Case(Term_sub(m, s), xi, Term_sub(n, s))
Term_sub(Term_app(m, n), s) → Term_app(Term_sub(m, s), Term_sub(n, s))
Term_sub(Term_pair(m, n), s) → Term_pair(Term_sub(m, s), Term_sub(n, s))
Term_sub(Term_inl(m), s) → Term_inl(Term_sub(m, s))
Term_sub(Term_inr(m), s) → Term_inr(Term_sub(m, s))
Term_sub(Term_var(x), Id) → Term_var(x)
Term_sub(Term_var(x), Cons_usual(y, m, s)) → m
Term_sub(Term_var(x), Cons_usual(y, m, s)) → Term_sub(Term_var(x), s)
Term_sub(Term_var(x), Cons_sum(xi, k, s)) → Term_sub(Term_var(x), s)
Term_sub(Term_sub(m, s), t) → Term_sub(m, Concat(s, t))
Sum_sub(xi, Id) → Sum_term_var(xi)
Sum_sub(xi, Cons_sum(psi, k, s)) → Sum_constant(k)
Sum_sub(xi, Cons_sum(psi, k, s)) → Sum_sub(xi, s)
Sum_sub(xi, Cons_usual(y, m, s)) → Sum_sub(xi, s)
Concat(Concat(s, t), u) → Concat(s, Concat(t, u))
Concat(Cons_usual(x, m, s), t) → Cons_usual(x, Term_sub(m, t), Concat(s, t))
Concat(Cons_sum(xi, k, s), t) → Cons_sum(xi, k, Concat(s, t))
Concat(Id, s) → s

Rewrite Strategy: FULL

(1) DecreasingLoopProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The following loop(s) give(s) rise to the lower bound Ω(n¹):
The rewrite sequence
Term_sub(Case(m, xi, n), Id) →⁺ Case(Term_sub(m, Id), xi, Term_sub(n, Id))
gives rise to a decreasing loop by considering the right hand sides subterm at position [0].
The pumping substitution is [m / Case(m, xi, n)].
The result substitution is [ ].

(2) BOUNDS(n^1, INF)